On a Theorem of Van Mill
نویسنده
چکیده
We fix an error in the proof of a theorem of Van Mill about homeomorphisms between compactifications of ω with small weight. Theorem 4.2. Let aω and bω be compactifications of ω. Assume that (1) there is a retraction r : aω → aω \ ω, (2) there is a retraction s : bω → bω \ ω, (3) f : aω \ ω → bω \ ω is a homeomorphism. If the weight of aω \ ω is less than p, then f can be extended to a homeomorphism f̄ : aω → bω. The above is Van Mill’s Theorem 4.2 from [5]. Andrea Medini noticed an error in Van Mill’s proof. In short, Claim 3 of that proof is wrong, though plausible at first reading. Upon close inspection, it is seen that while π[r[Uα,i] ∩M1] ⊆∗ s[Vα,i] ∩N1 and π[r[Uα,i] ∩M2] ⊇∗ s[Vα,i] ∩N2 are true, neither π[r[Uα,i] ∩ ω] ⊆∗ s[Vα,i] nor π[r[Uα,i] ∩ ω] ⊇∗ s[Vα,i] is true in general. I propose the following proof of the theorem. Lemma 1. Suppose A and B are boolean subalgebras of P(ω) such that both A and B has size less than p and the empty set is the only finite set in A ∪ B. If H is an isomorphism from A to B, then there is a permutation g of ω such that g[A] =∗ H(A) for all A ∈ A. Proof. Fix H as above. By Bell’s Theorem [1], it suffices to exhibit a σ-centered forcing P and a set D of fewer than p-many dense subsets of P such that a map g as above can be constructed from an arbitrary filter G of P that meets every set in D. Let P be a forcing order with conditions of the form p = 〈gp,Fp〉 where gp is an injective finite partial function from ω to ω and Fp is a finite subalgebra of A. Order P by declaring q ≤ p if gq ⊇ gp, Fq ⊇ Fp, and (gq \ gp)[U ] ⊆ H(U) for all U ∈ Fp. If p, q ∈ P and gp = gq, then 〈gp, E〉 is a common extension of p and q if E is a finite subalgebra of A such that E ⊇ Fp ∪ Fq. Thus, P is σ-centered. Moreover, we could have chosen E to contain an arbitrary element of A, so the set DA = {p ∈ P : A ∈ Fp} is dense for all A ∈ A. For each n < ω, let D′ n and D ′′ n respectively denote {p ∈ P : n ∈ dom(gp)} and {p ∈ P : n ∈ ran(gp)}. Given n < ω and p ∈ P \ D′ n, let A be the unique atomic
منابع مشابه
Guram Bezhanishvili , Nick Bezhanishvili , Joel Lucero - Bryan and Jan van Mill S 4 . 3 and hereditarily extremally disconnected spaces
Research Article Guram Bezhanishvili, Nick Bezhanishvili, Joel Lucero-Bryan and Jan van Mill S4.3 and hereditarily extremally disconnected spaces Abstract: Themodal logic S4.3 de nes the class of hereditarily extremally disconnected spaces (HED-spaces). We construct a countable HED-subspaceX of the Gleason cover of the real closed unit interval [0, 1] such that S4.3 is the logic ofX.
متن کاملOn a Generalization of Lyapounov's Theorem
We provide a simpler proof of Gouweleeuw’s theorem about the convexity of the range of an R-valued vector measure Fin terms of $. We also discuss possible extensions of Gouweleeuw’s results to vector measures with values in infinite-dimensional vector spaces and to unbounded vector measures.
متن کاملNegligible sets in Erdős spaces
Both spaces were introduced and shown to be one-dimensional but totally disconnected by Paul Erdős [9] in 1940. This result together with the obvious fact that E and Ec are homeomorphic to their squares make these spaces important examples in Dimension Theory. Both E and Ec are universal spaces for the class of almost zero-dimensional spaces; see [7, Theorem 4.15]. A subset of a space is called...
متن کاملEasier proofs of coloring theorems
We present a simpler proof of the known theorem that a fixed-point free homeomorphism on an n-dimensional paracompact space can be colored with n+ 3 colors. 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
متن کاملSome examples related to colorings
We complement the literature by proving that for a fixed-point free map f : X → X the statements (1) f admits a finite functionally closed cover A with f [A]∩A = ∅ for all A ∈ A (i.e., a coloring) and (2) βf is fixed-point free are equivalent. When functionally closed is weakened to closed, we show that normality is sufficient to prove equivalence, and give an example to show it cannot be omitt...
متن کاملHomogeneous subsets of the real line
If A C R then A is homogeneous provided that A + Q = A. As an application we give an elementary proof of Menu’s theorem that the real line can be decomposed in two homogeneous homeomorphic subsets. We also show that such a decomposition is not topologically unique. There are homogeneous A, B C R with A RBA, B ~ RBB but A B.
متن کامل